HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO
HBIL.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)) and YAVG.NEO (Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIL.TO returned 2.87% vs 133.32% for YAVG.NEO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBIL.TO achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than YAVG.NEO's 59.96% return.
HBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YAVG.NEO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 16.03%
- YTD
- 59.96%
- 6M
- 46.17%
- 1Y
- 133.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 0.59% | 2.29% |
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 59.96% | 57.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBIL.TO and YAVG.NEO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HBIL.TO
YAVG.NEO
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBIL.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 5.18 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.74 | 15.35 | -5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBIL.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.81 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 2.03 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum YAVG.NEO drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIL.TO and YAVG.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBIL.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -39.57% | +37.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.95% | -25.90% | +24.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.50% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -8.26% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 8.72% | -8.42% |
Volatility
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) is 0.62%, while Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YAVG.NEO) has a volatility of 11.15%. This indicates that HBIL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YAVG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBIL.TO | YAVG.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 11.15% | -10.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.24% | 37.61% | -36.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66% | 47.84% | -46.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 52.43% | -50.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 52.43% | -50.40% |
Dividends
HBIL.TO vs. YAVG.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than YAVG.NEO's 21.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIL.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 6.52% | 7.49% | 2.58% |
YAVG.NEO Broadcom (AVGO) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 21.76% | 8.90% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBIL.TO and YAVG.NEO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Purpose Investments.
Find the right allocation for HBIL.TO and YAVG.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer