PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIL.TO achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than HSAV.TO's 1.16% return.


HBIL.TO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.42%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HSAV.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.69%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIL.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HSAV.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBIL.TO
HBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HSAV.TO
HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBIL.TOHSAV.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

2.17

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

3.22

-1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

5.32

-3.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.89

14.57

-10.68

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIL.TO and HSAV.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBIL.TOHSAV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.17

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.78

-1.23

Correlation

The correlation between HBIL.TO and HSAV.TO is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum HSAV.TO drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIL.TO and HSAV.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HBIL.TOHSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-2.18%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.30%

-0.59%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

0.00%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.19%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.22%

+0.23%

Volatility

HBIL.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBIL.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.42%. This indicates that HBIL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HBIL.TOHSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.42%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.13%

0.96%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85%

1.37%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.05%

1.75%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.05%

1.58%

+0.47%