HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO
HBIL-U.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units) and ZTL.NEO (BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. HBIL-U.TO is actively managed, while ZTL.NEO is passively managed. Over the past year, HBIL-U.TO returned 4.03% vs 3.64% for ZTL.NEO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
HBIL-U.TO is traded in USD, while ZTL.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZTL.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBIL-U.TO achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZTL.NEO's -1.46% return.
HBIL-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 4.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTL.NEO
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- -2.19%
- 5Y*
- -7.70%
- 10Y*
- —
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIL-U.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units | 1.33% | 4.81% | -0.94% |
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF | -1.46% | 4.33% | -11.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBIL-U.TO and ZTL.NEO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HBIL-U.TO and ZTL.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
HBIL-U.TO
ZTL.NEO
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) and BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBIL-U.TO | ZTL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.07 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 0.52 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.88 | 1.22 | +13.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBIL-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.48%, smaller than the maximum ZTL.NEO drawdown of -48.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIL-U.TO and ZTL.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBIL-U.TO | ZTL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -48.73% | +47.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.07% | -7.12% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -41.41% | +40.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -21.62% | +21.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | 3.00% | -2.73% |
Volatility
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) is 1.25%, while BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF (ZTL.NEO) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that HBIL-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBIL-U.TO | ZTL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 2.96% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 7.29% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 9.89% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 16.99% | -14.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 16.66% | -14.54% |
Dividends
HBIL-U.TO vs. ZTL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
HBIL-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, more than ZTL.NEO's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBIL-U.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units | 6.75% | 7.37% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZTL.NEO BMO Long-Term US Treasury Bond Index ETF | 3.19% | 3.15% | 3.07% | 3.55% | 3.44% | 2.46% | 2.26% | 2.55% | 2.75% | 2.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBIL-U.TO and ZTL.NEO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and BMO.
Find the right allocation for HBIL-U.TO and ZTL.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer