PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HBIL-U.TO is traded in USD, while UTES.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the UTES.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBIL-U.TO achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than UTES.TO's 6.78% return.


HBIL-U.TO

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.94%
YTD
1.22%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.67%

UTES.TO

1D
-1.02%
1M
0.40%
6M
3.10%
YTD
6.78%
1Y
13.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.55K$25.17K$45.60K
$2.51M$2.05M$1.96M

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HBIL-U.TO and UTES.TO is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024

0.13

The correlation between HBIL-U.TO and UTES.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HBIL-U.TO
HBIL-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIL-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

UTES.TO
UTES.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTES.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBIL-U.TOUTES.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.75

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

5.43

+3.43

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the UTES.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBIL-U.TO and UTES.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBIL-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -1.48%, smaller than the maximum UTES.TO drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIL-U.TO and UTES.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBIL-U.TOUTES.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-14.19%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.32%

-7.80%

+6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-6.42%

+5.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.34%

-3.36%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

2.50%

-2.14%

Volatility

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) is 0.72%, while Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES.TO) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that HBIL-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBIL-U.TOUTES.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

4.98%

-4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

9.48%

-7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

11.77%

-9.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.14%

12.97%

-10.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.14%

12.97%

-10.83%

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBIL-U.TO has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES.TO's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBIL-U.TO vs. UTES.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBIL-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than UTES.TO's 18.50% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HBIL-U.TO and UTES.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBIL-U.TO is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBIL-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for UTES.TO.

HBIL-U.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while UTES.TO is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for HBIL-U.TO and 0.84% for UTES.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBIL-U.TO and UTES.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer