HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO).
HBGD.TO and XMW.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBGD.TO is managed by Global X. XMW.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012.
Performance
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | -0.49% | 53.48% | 15.92% | 129.66% | -56.87% | 375.98% | 117.21% | 41.31% | -100.00% |
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 1.32% | 5.84% | 20.05% | 4.68% | -4.33% | 12.80% | 0.51% | 14.74% | 0.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than XMW.TO's 1.32% return.
HBGD.TO
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 43.43%
- 5Y*
- 38.80%
- 10Y*
- —
XMW.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 0.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than XMW.TO's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBGD.TO
XMW.TO
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBGD.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 0.03 | +2.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 0.10 | +2.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.01 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 0.17 | +3.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 0.53 | +10.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBGD.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.03 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.87 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | 0.94 | -1.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBGD.TO and XMW.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than XMW.TO's 1.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.64% | 1.22% | 0.83% | 0.32% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMW.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF | 1.56% | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.98% | 1.66% | 1.43% | 1.52% | 2.20% | 2.01% | 1.61% | 2.02% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XMW.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and XMW.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBGD.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -21.42% | -78.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -8.10% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.43% | -14.45% | -48.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -2.77% | -97.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -2.75% | -97.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 2.72% | +4.82% |
Volatility
HBGD.TO vs. XMW.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (XMW.TO) at 3.39%. This indicates that HBGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBGD.TO | XMW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 3.39% | +9.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.05% | 5.85% | +23.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.10% | 10.13% | +29.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.43% | 8.75% | +87.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.08% | 11.08% | +77.00% |