HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO
HBGD.TO (Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF) and FDN.TO (First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - HBGD.TO tracks the Solactive Big Data & Hardware Index while FDN.TO tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HBGD.TO returned 24.16%/yr vs 3.24%/yr for FDN.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBGD.TO charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FDN.TO.
Performance
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a 43.70% return, which is significantly higher than FDN.TO's 0.50% return.
HBGD.TO
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- -18.34%
- 6M
- 23.47%
- YTD
- 43.70%
- 1Y
- 85.21%
- 3Y*
- 44.62%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 184.27%
FDN.TO
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 1.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.24K | CA$45.17K | CA$23.22K | |
| CA$189.22K | CA$324.68K | CA$347.34K |
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 43.70% | 53.48% | 15.92% | 129.66% | -56.87% | 59.75% | 555.62% | 323.86% | 4,068.42% |
FDN.TO First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF | 0.50% | 5.45% | 41.28% | 49.01% | -43.35% | -5.63% | 6.27% | 15.99% | -4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBGD.TO and FDN.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018 | 0.26 |
The correlation between HBGD.TO and FDN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HBGD.TO
FDN.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
HBGD.TO
FDN.TO
Financial Services
HBGD.TO
FDN.TO
Real Estate
HBGD.TO
FDN.TO
-
Communication Services
HBGD.TO
FDN.TO
Basic Materials
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
Consumer Defensive
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
-
Energy
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
-
Healthcare
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
Industrials
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
Utilities
HBGD.TO
-
FDN.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBGD.TO
FDN.TO
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBGD.TO | FDN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.04 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 0.09 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 0.21 | +8.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than FDN.TO's maximum drawdown of -50.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and FDN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBGD.TO | FDN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -50.44% | -49.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.30% | -21.40% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.68% | -26.31% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.43% | -50.39% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.01% | -6.94% | -64.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.16% | -10.73% | -75.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.33% | 9.47% | -0.14% |
Volatility
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.63% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO) at 5.46%. This indicates that HBGD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBGD.TO | FDN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.63% | 5.46% | +14.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.33% | 16.62% | +20.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.97% | 20.17% | +24.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.13% | 26.14% | +14.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 238,183.37% | 21.17% | +238,162.20% |
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FDN.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBGD.TO vs. FDN.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while FDN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN.TO First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 5.69% | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.76% | 1.51% | 1.50% |
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 0.27% | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.64% | 1.22% | 1.65% | 0.96% | 13.70% | 18.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBGD.TO and FDN.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBGD.TO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBGD.TO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for FDN.TO.
HBGD.TO tracks Solactive Big Data & Hardware Index, while FDN.TO tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for HBGD.TO and 0.66% for FDN.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBGD.TO and FDN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer