HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO
HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) and ZSB.TO (BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBB.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond, while ZSB.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HBB.TO returned 0.33%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for ZSB.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBB.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ZSB.TO.
Performance
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBB.TO achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than ZSB.TO's 0.96% return.
HBB.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.30%
ZSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 1.48% | 1.84% | 3.96% | 5.76% | -11.94% | -2.35% | 8.33% | 5.81% | 2.17% |
ZSB.TO BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 0.96% | 3.77% | 5.55% | 5.05% | -4.08% | -1.20% | 5.13% | 2.95% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBB.TO and ZSB.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between HBB.TO and ZSB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HBB.TO
ZSB.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
HBB.TO
ZSB.TO
Basic Materials
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Communication Services
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Energy
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Financial Services
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Healthcare
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Industrials
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Technology
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Utilities
HBB.TO
-
ZSB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBB.TO
ZSB.TO
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) and BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBB.TO | ZSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.29 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.95 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 6.41 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBB.TO | ZSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.45 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.74 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.90 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, which is greater than ZSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBB.TO and ZSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBB.TO | ZSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.23% | -7.49% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | -1.46% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -1.46% | -4.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -7.12% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -0.21% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -1.50% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 0.44% | +0.79% |
Volatility
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO) at 0.81%. This indicates that HBB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBB.TO | ZSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 0.81% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 1.62% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 1.95% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 2.74% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 2.63% | +4.46% |
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HBB.TO vs. ZSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZSB.TO BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.16% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBB.TO and ZSB.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for ZSB.TO.
HBB.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while ZSB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. HBB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond, while ZSB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HBB.TO and 0.10% for ZSB.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBB.TO and ZSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer