HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO
HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) and HXDM.TO (Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBB.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond, while HXDM.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HBB.TO returned 0.33%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for HXDM.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBB.TO charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HXDM.TO.
Performance
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBB.TO achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than HXDM.TO's 9.69% return.
HBB.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.30%
HXDM.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 1.48% | 1.84% | 3.96% | 5.76% | -11.94% | -2.35% | 8.33% | 5.81% | 1.19% | 2.10% |
HXDM.TO Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF | 9.69% | 24.06% | 11.07% | 15.09% | -8.78% | 10.16% | 4.59% | 15.19% | -7.21% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBB.TO and HXDM.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, HBB.TO and HXDM.TO have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HBB.TO
HXDM.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
HBB.TO
HXDM.TO
Basic Materials
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Communication Services
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Consumer Defensive
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Energy
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Financial Services
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Healthcare
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Industrials
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Technology
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Utilities
HBB.TO
-
HXDM.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBB.TO
HXDM.TO
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) and Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBB.TO | HXDM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.90 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 7.36 | -5.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBB.TO | HXDM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.46 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.75 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBB.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.23%, smaller than the maximum HXDM.TO drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBB.TO and HXDM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBB.TO | HXDM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.23% | -28.43% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | -11.40% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -14.65% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -23.87% | +7.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.97% | -2.03% | -0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -4.75% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 2.94% | -1.71% |
Volatility
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) is 1.58%, while Global X Intl Developed Markets Equity Index Corporate Class ETF (HXDM.TO) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that HBB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXDM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBB.TO | HXDM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 5.80% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.43% | 12.54% | -9.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.44% | 14.92% | -10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.54% | 14.07% | -7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 15.42% | -8.33% |
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than HXDM.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HBB.TO vs. HXDM.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither HBB.TO nor HXDM.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
HBB.TO and HXDM.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HXDM.TO.
HBB.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while HXDM.TO is International Equity. HBB.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Select Universe Bond, while HXDM.TO tracks Global X EAFE Futures Roll Index (Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HBB.TO and 0.20% for HXDM.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBB.TO and HXDM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer