HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBA.TO (Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF) and UMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBA.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index, while UMVP.TO is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HBA.TO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.87%
• YTD: -0.51%
• 6M: 3.67%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: —

UMVP.TO

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HBA.TO Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	1.82%
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HBA.TO and UMVP.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.04

Return for Risk

HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBA.TO

HBA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 15
HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
HBA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HBA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HBA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
HBA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF (UMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBA.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.59	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.42	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBA.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	5.03	-4.07

Drawdowns

HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBA.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, which is greater than UMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -4.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBA.TO and UMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBA.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-4.57%	-16.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.95%	-0.96%	-9.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-0.81%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HBA.TO	UMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.87%	9.11%	+9.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.95%	9.11%	+8.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	9.11%	+9.31%

Dividends

HBA.TO vs. UMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than UMVP.TO's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HBA.TO Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	4.17%	4.11%	4.45%	6.67%	8.56%	5.81%	2.66%
UMVP.TO Hamilton Champions Utilities Index ETF	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBA.TO and UMVP.TO in my portfolio?

HBA.TO and UMVP.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HBA.TO and UMVP.TO?

HBA.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while UMVP.TO is Utilities Equities. HBA.TO tracks Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index, while UMVP.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index.