HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HBA.TO (Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF) and HBIL-U.TO (Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - HBA.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index, while HBIL-U.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Hamilton. HBA.TO is passively managed, while HBIL-U.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, HBA.TO returned 10.31% vs 6.67% for HBIL-U.TO. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HBA.TO is traded in CAD, while HBIL-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HBIL-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBA.TO achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than HBIL-U.TO's 3.97% return.

HBA.TO

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 4.65%
• 6M: 4.89%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 1Y: 10.31%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 13.52%
• 10Y*: —

HBIL-U.TO

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 2.26%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 1Y: 6.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HBA.TO Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	4.47%	13.01%	0.47%
HBIL-U.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units	3.97%	0.03%	4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HBA.TO and HBIL-U.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2024	0.10

Return for Risk

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBA.TO

HBA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 20
HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
HBA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
HBA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
HBA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
HBA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

HBIL-U.TO

HBIL-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
HBIL-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
HBIL-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
HBIL-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HBIL-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) and Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBA.TO	HBIL-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	1.43	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	2.05	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.25	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	1.67	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.76	4.26	-2.50

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the HBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBA.TO and HBIL-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBA.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, which is greater than HBIL-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBA.TO and HBIL-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBA.TO	HBIL-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.66%	-6.68%	-37.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.93%	-4.01%	-8.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.49%	-2.10%	-4.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-2.26%	-3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.87%	1.57%	+4.30%

Volatility

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units (HBIL-U.TO) at 1.88%. This indicates that HBA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBIL-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBA.TO	HBIL-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	1.88%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.09%	3.60%	+11.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	4.68%	+14.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.94%	5.86%	+12.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.36%	5.86%	+22.50%

Dividends

HBA.TO vs. HBIL-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

HBA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than HBIL-U.TO's 6.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HBA.TO Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF	4.01%	4.11%	4.45%	6.67%	8.56%	5.81%	3.02%
HBIL-U.TO Hamilton U.S. T-Bill YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF USD Unhedged Units	6.75%	7.37%	2.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBA.TO and HBIL-U.TO in my portfolio?

HBA.TO and HBIL-U.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HBA.TO and HBIL-U.TO?

HBA.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HBIL-U.TO is Government Bonds.