PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAVLX vs. HMCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Large Cap Value Fund (HAVLX) and Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAVLX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than HMCNX's 13.22% return.


HAVLX

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
0.92%
6M
0.26%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
14.16%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
11.92%

HMCNX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.85%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.65%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
14.09%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HAVLX
Harbor Large Cap Value Fund
0.92%11.07%15.60%19.70%-14.98%24.90%14.46%3.71%
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
13.22%9.38%7.01%16.44%-17.46%24.12%18.45%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HAVLX and HMCNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.94

The correlation between HAVLX and HMCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAVLX vs. HMCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAVLX
HAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
HAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
HAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HMCNX
HMCNX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HMCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Large Cap Value Fund (HAVLX) and Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAVLXHMCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.15

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.42

12.14

-8.72

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the HMCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAVLX and HMCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAVLXHMCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.99

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.41

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.51

+0.08

Drawdowns

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAVLX drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than HMCNX's maximum drawdown of -38.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAVLX and HMCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAVLXHMCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-38.10%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-9.00%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.87%

-20.80%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-23.82%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-0.79%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-6.90%

+0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

2.33%

+0.54%

Volatility

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Large Cap Value Fund (HAVLX) is 2.94%, while Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that HAVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAVLXHMCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

4.05%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

10.48%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

14.23%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.05%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

21.32%

-2.69%

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAVLX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than HMCNX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAVLX vs. HMCNX - Dividend Comparison

HAVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.41%, more than HMCNX's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAVLX
Harbor Large Cap Value Fund
21.41%21.82%14.78%4.06%5.13%3.33%3.46%0.88%2.84%3.57%4.41%5.74%
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
2.21%2.50%0.27%1.94%2.93%1.79%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAVLX and HMCNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HMCNX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to HAVLX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAVLX dropped -53.23% vs HMCNX's -38.10%.

HMCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAVLX and HMCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer