HAVGX vs. YFSIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HAVGX (Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, HAVGX returned 8.52%/yr vs 8.25%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAVGX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.

Performance

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAVGX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 22.44% return.

HAVGX

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: -0.53%
• 1Y: 11.90%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: 11.64%

YFSIX

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 22.44%
• 6M: 24.75%
• 1Y: 22.66%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: 8.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund	0.04%	13.22%	15.58%	9.26%	-7.97%	24.40%	15.35%	33.26%	-5.90%	16.31%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	22.44%	14.91%	-0.34%	16.64%	-9.15%	13.13%	18.46%	24.40%	2.18%	20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between HAVGX and YFSIX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between HAVGX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HAVGX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAVGX

HAVGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
HAVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HAVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
HAVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
HAVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
HAVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

YFSIX

YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAVGX	YFSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.01	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.21	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.56	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.11	4.85	+1.26

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAVGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAVGX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAVGX drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAVGX and YFSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAVGX	YFSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.37%	-35.10%	-15.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-14.20%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.85%	-14.20%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.65%	-25.14%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.80%	-4.53%	+1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.46%	-4.89%	-1.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	4.54%	-2.41%

Volatility

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) is 2.98%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that HAVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAVGX	YFSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	6.69%	-3.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.66%	21.43%	-13.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.99%	21.93%	-11.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	15.56%	-0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	16.30%	+0.73%

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAVGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAVGX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

HAVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund	8.26%	8.28%	8.54%	4.76%	10.14%	5.65%	0.84%	1.39%	6.38%	2.65%	1.18%	1.26%
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund	0.00%	0.00%	8.68%	8.02%	4.32%	8.18%	4.76%	6.59%	0.71%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAVGX and YFSIX in my portfolio?

HAVGX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAVGX or YFSIX?

YFSIX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to HAVGX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAVGX dropped -50.37% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.