HAVGX vs. BQLCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HAVGX (Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund) and BQLCX (Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. Over the past 10 years, HAVGX returned 11.65%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for BQLCX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HAVGX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BQLCX.

Performance

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) and Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAVGX achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than BQLCX's 3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HAVGX has outperformed BQLCX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while BQLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.

HAVGX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 2.39%
• 6M: 3.06%
• YTD: 5.34%
• 1Y: 13.05%
• 3Y*: 11.80%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 11.65%
• ALL TIME*: 8.05%

BQLCX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.12%
• YTD: 3.94%
• 1Y: 11.20%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 10.07%
• ALL TIME*: 11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BQLCX Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund	5.34%	13.22%	15.58%	9.26%	-7.97%	24.40%	15.35%	33.26%	-5.90%	18.46%
BQLCX Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund	3.94%	9.54%	6.70%	20.96%	-10.58%	27.60%	9.54%	29.95%	-5.58%	16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HAVGX and BQLCX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010	0.93

The correlation between HAVGX and BQLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HAVGX vs. BQLCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAVGX

HAVGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
HAVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
HAVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
HAVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HAVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
HAVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BQLCX

BQLCX Risk / Return Rank: 24
BQLCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BQLCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BQLCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BQLCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BQLCX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) and Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAVGX	BQLCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.87	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	1.29	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.19	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.24	3.75	+1.49

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAVGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the BQLCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAVGX and BQLCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAVGX drawdown since its inception was -50.37%, which is greater than BQLCX's maximum drawdown of -34.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAVGX and BQLCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAVGX	BQLCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.37%	-34.47%	-15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.90%	-7.56%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.85%	-21.25%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.65%	-21.25%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.50%	-34.47%	-0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	0.00%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-3.55%	-2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.40%	-0.20%

Volatility

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund (HAVGX) is 3.38%, while Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund (BQLCX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that HAVGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BQLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAVGX	BQLCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	3.94%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.97%	8.28%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.27%	10.36%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.71%	15.12%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	16.83%	+0.16%

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAVGX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than BQLCX's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAVGX vs. BQLCX - Dividend Comparison

HAVGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, more than BQLCX's 7.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BQLCX Bright Rock Quality Large Cap Fund	7.59%	7.75%	0.92%	2.88%	15.70%	8.41%	3.51%	5.05%	5.11%	2.71%	3.59%	3.26%
HAVGX Haverford Quality Growth Stock Fund	7.84%	8.28%	8.54%	4.76%	10.14%	5.65%	0.84%	1.39%	6.38%	2.65%	1.18%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAVGX and BQLCX in my portfolio?

HAVGX and BQLCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAVGX or BQLCX?

BQLCX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to HAVGX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAVGX dropped -50.37% vs BQLCX's -34.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.