HAUZ vs. REM
HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) and REM (iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - HAUZ tracks the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index while REM tracks the FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAUZ returned 3.62%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for REM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAUZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for REM.
Performance
HAUZ vs. REM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than REM's -2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, HAUZ has outperformed REM with an annualized return of 3.62%, while REM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.55% annualized return.
HAUZ
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
REM
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
HAUZ vs. REM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | -2.64% | 22.70% | -5.44% | 6.29% | -22.24% | 9.82% | -6.23% | 20.89% | -9.12% | 27.52% |
REM iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF | -2.10% | 13.30% | -1.00% | 14.43% | -27.56% | 16.14% | -19.99% | 21.34% | -3.09% | 18.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAUZ and REM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013 | 0.44 |
The correlation between HAUZ and REM shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HAUZ vs. REM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAUZ
REM
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
HAUZ
REM
Industrials
HAUZ
REM
-
Communication Services
HAUZ
REM
-
Consumer Cyclical
HAUZ
REM
-
Financial Services
HAUZ
REM
Utilities
HAUZ
REM
-
Technology
HAUZ
REM
-
Basic Materials
HAUZ
REM
-
Healthcare
HAUZ
REM
-
Energy
HAUZ
REM
-
Consumer Defensive
HAUZ
REM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAUZ vs. REM — Risk / Return Rank
HAUZ
REM
HAUZ vs. REM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAUZ | REM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.81 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 2.33 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAUZ | REM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.69 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | -0.11 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.09 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.05 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
HAUZ vs. REM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, smaller than the maximum REM drawdown of -74.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and REM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAUZ | REM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.51% | -74.73% | +35.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -14.25% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -21.91% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.52% | -43.31% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | -68.52% | +29.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.73% | -23.85% | +12.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -38.35% | +26.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 4.95% | -0.30% |
Volatility
HAUZ vs. REM - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) at 3.81%. This indicates that HAUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAUZ | REM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 3.81% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 13.01% | -1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 16.85% | -3.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 23.57% | -7.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 28.27% | -11.30% |
HAUZ vs. REM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than REM's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAUZ vs. REM - Dividend Comparison
HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than REM's 9.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 4.58% | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.50% | 1.99% | 4.84% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 9.42% |
REM iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF | 9.19% | 8.70% | 9.61% | 9.46% | 11.13% | 7.29% | 7.72% | 8.16% | 10.00% | 9.97% | 10.03% | 11.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAUZ and REM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAUZ has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to REM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs REM's -74.73%.
On 10-year performance, HAUZ leads with 3.62% vs 2.55% for REM. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, REM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HAUZ has performed better with a 3.62% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REM.
REM has the higher dividend yield at 9.19%, compared with 4.58% for HAUZ.
HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while REM tracks FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.48% for REM.
REM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAUZ and REM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer