PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAUZ vs. ERET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAUZ vs. ERET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than ERET's 11.91% return.


HAUZ

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.67%
6M
-4.12%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
3.27%
ALL TIME*
3.14%

ERET

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.31%
6M
8.69%
YTD
11.91%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.74K$48.03K$74.82K
$1.79M$1.92M$2.36M

HAUZ vs. ERET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
0.36%22.70%-5.44%6.29%2.26%
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
11.91%10.26%0.60%10.25%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between HAUZ and ERET is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

0.80

The correlation between HAUZ and ERET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAUZ vs. ERET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAUZ
HAUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
HAUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
HAUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ERET
ERET Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAUZ vs. ERET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAUZERETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.26

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.67

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

6.25

-5.32

HAUZ vs. ERET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAUZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the ERET Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAUZ and ERET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAUZ vs. ERET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, which is greater than ERET's maximum drawdown of -20.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and ERET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAUZERETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.51%

-20.30%

-19.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-10.47%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.88%

-17.61%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.01%

-1.62%

-7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-5.63%

-6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.32%

2.80%

+3.52%

Volatility

HAUZ vs. ERET - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) have volatilities of 3.47% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAUZERETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.32%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

10.05%

+1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.17%

12.25%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.98%

15.65%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

15.65%

+1.31%

HAUZ vs. ERET - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ERET's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAUZ vs. ERET - Dividend Comparison

HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than ERET's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
3.25%3.79%4.26%3.67%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAUZ
Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF
3.54%4.46%4.50%3.50%1.99%4.84%3.37%3.69%1.93%2.59%2.18%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAUZ and ERET have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAUZ has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to ERET (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs ERET's -20.30%.

On 3-year performance, ERET leads with 10.14% vs 7.90% for HAUZ. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ERET has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ERET has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ERET.

HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.25% for ERET.

HAUZ tracks iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, while ERET tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Target Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.30% for ERET.

ERET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAUZ and ERET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer