PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HASCX vs. HMCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) and Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HASCX achieves a 33.41% return, which is significantly higher than HMCNX's 16.17% return.


HASCX

1D
0.76%
1M
7.86%
YTD
33.41%
6M
30.72%
1Y
48.54%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
12.49%

HMCNX

1D
0.72%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.17%
6M
14.85%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HASCX
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund
33.41%3.78%10.93%15.18%-9.59%14.55%13.15%2.96%
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
16.17%9.38%7.01%16.44%-17.46%24.12%18.45%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HASCX and HMCNX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019

0.92

The correlation between HASCX and HMCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HASCX vs. HMCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HASCX
HASCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HMCNX
HMCNX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
HMCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HMCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) and Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HASCXHMCNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.36

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.12

3.29

+1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.63

12.66

+4.98

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HASCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the HMCNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HASCX and HMCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HASCX drawdown since its inception was -58.90%, which is greater than HMCNX's maximum drawdown of -38.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HASCX and HMCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HASCXHMCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.90%

-38.10%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-9.00%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.34%

-20.80%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-23.82%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-6.85%

-1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.33%

+0.53%

Volatility

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Small Cap Value Fund (HASCX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Fund (HMCNX) at 4.42%. This indicates that HASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HASCXHMCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.42%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

10.86%

+4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.81%

14.55%

+5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

17.09%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.95%

21.29%

+1.66%

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HASCX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than HMCNX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

HASCX vs. HMCNX - Dividend Comparison

HASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than HMCNX's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HASCX
Harbor Small Cap Value Fund
2.56%3.41%0.62%6.99%7.25%5.64%0.43%1.41%11.18%1.98%0.36%3.98%
HMCNX
Harbor Mid Cap Fund
2.15%2.50%0.27%1.94%2.93%1.79%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HASCX and HMCNX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HASCX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to HMCNX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HASCX dropped -58.90% vs HMCNX's -38.10%.

HASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HASCX and HMCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer