HAO vs. QMNIX
HAO (Haoxi Health Technology Limited) is a stock, while QMNIX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I) is Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AQR. Over the past year, HAO returned -99.91% vs 5.55% for QMNIX. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
HAO vs. QMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAO achieves a -99.89% return, which is significantly lower than QMNIX's -6.08% return.
HAO
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -85.95%
- 6M
- -99.92%
- YTD
- -99.89%
- 1Y
- -99.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -98.95%
QMNIX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $826.16K | $3.87M | $2.72M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HAO vs. QMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HAO Haoxi Health Technology Limited | -99.89% | -71.47% | -96.47% |
QMNIX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I | -6.08% | 26.54% | 18.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAO and QMNIX is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAO vs. QMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
HAO
QMNIX
HAO vs. QMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAO | QMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.51 | 1.14 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 0.59 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.89 | 1.23 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAO vs. QMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QMNIX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAO and QMNIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAO | QMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -38.80% | -61.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -99.93% | -9.82% | -90.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -6.38% | -93.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.27% | -10.30% | -71.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.77% | 4.66% | +48.11% |
Volatility
HAO vs. QMNIX - Volatility Comparison
Haoxi Health Technology Limited (HAO) has a higher volatility of 111.69% compared to AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) at 2.66%. This indicates that HAO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAO | QMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 111.69% | 2.66% | +109.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 309.82% | 5.71% | +304.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 155.58% | 7.05% | +148.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.44% | 9.27% | +154.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.44% | 8.33% | +155.11% |
Dividends
HAO vs. QMNIX - Dividend Comparison
HAO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAO Haoxi Health Technology Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QMNIX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I | 1.50% | 1.41% | 6.10% | 21.48% | 5.95% | 1.39% | 17.42% | 3.83% | 0.48% | 3.48% | 1.51% | 2.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAO and QMNIX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAO has higher volatility (111.69%) compared to QMNIX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAO dropped -100.00% vs QMNIX's -38.80%.
QMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAO and QMNIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer