HAKY vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HAKY (Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAKY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

HAKY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF (HAKY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HAKY

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 18.02%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 12.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAKY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
HAKY Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF	23.43%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between HAKY and OMAH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.07

HAKY vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAKY	OMAH
Technology	91.2%	13.6%
Industrials	8.8%	-
Financial Services	1.0%	38.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	16.2%
Energy	-	10.5%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HAKY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAKY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF (HAKY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAKY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.52	0.74	+1.78

Drawdowns

HAKY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAKY drawdown since its inception was -13.12%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAKY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAKY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.12%	-11.83%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-2.12%	-1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-1.26%	-3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HAKY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.72%	8.06%	+22.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.72%	13.20%	+17.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.72%	13.20%	+17.52%

HAKY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAKY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAKY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

HAKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than OMAH's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HAKY Amplify HACK Cybersecurity Covered Call ETF	5.16%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.36%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAKY and OMAH in my portfolio?

HAKY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAKY or OMAH?

On fees, HAKY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAKY or OMAH?

HAKY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAKY or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 5.16% for HAKY.

What is the main difference between HAKY and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HAKY and 0.95% for OMAH.