PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HAD.TO having a 0.97% return and HSAV.TO slightly higher at 1.00%.


HAD.TO

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.64%
YTD
0.97%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
1.37%

HSAV.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.19%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HAD.TO
Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF
0.97%3.04%4.29%6.25%-12.17%-4.66%6.35%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
1.00%2.58%4.24%5.04%2.79%0.66%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between HAD.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAD.TO
HAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

HSAV.TO
HSAV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSAV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAD.TOHSAV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

3.92

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.48

9.99

-6.51

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the HSAV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAD.TO and HSAV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAD.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.77%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAD.TO and HSAV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAD.TOHSAV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.77%

-2.18%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-0.59%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.95%

-1.06%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-2.18%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-0.22%

-4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-0.19%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.23%

+0.92%

Volatility

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF (HAD.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.34%. This indicates that HAD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAD.TOHSAV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.46%

0.34%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.61%

0.97%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98%

1.41%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

1.78%

+5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.90%

1.57%

+7.33%

Dividends

HAD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, while HSAV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAD.TO
Global X Active Canadian Bond ETF
3.73%3.46%3.14%3.04%3.12%2.09%2.04%2.29%2.64%2.85%2.96%2.61%
HSAV.TO
Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAD.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAD.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while HSAV.TO is Money Market.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAD.TO and HSAV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer