HACBX vs. SCOAX
HACBX (Harbor Core Bond Fund) and SCOAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, HACBX returned -0.02%/yr vs -0.41%/yr for SCOAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HACBX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SCOAX.
Performance
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACBX achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than SCOAX's 0.30% return.
HACBX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SCOAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.82%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACBX Harbor Core Bond Fund | 0.64% | 7.02% | 1.57% | 5.73% | -13.36% | -1.66% | 9.10% | 8.58% | 1.75% |
SCOAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund | 0.30% | 7.56% | 0.82% | 5.44% | -14.84% | -1.49% | 9.49% | 9.59% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACBX and SCOAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between HACBX and SCOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACBX vs. SCOAX — Risk / Return Rank
HACBX
SCOAX
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Core Bond Fund (HACBX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HACBX | SCOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.62 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.01 | 4.56 | +0.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACBX drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum SCOAX drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACBX and SCOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACBX | SCOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -20.12% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -3.06% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.26% | -7.02% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.43% | -19.90% | +1.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -3.80% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -5.46% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.08% | -0.12% |
Volatility
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Core Bond Fund (HACBX) is 1.15%, while SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (SCOAX) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that HACBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACBX | SCOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.22% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | 2.98% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 4.02% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 6.37% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 5.23% | +0.02% |
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HACBX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCOAX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
HACBX vs. SCOAX - Dividend Comparison
HACBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than SCOAX's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACBX Harbor Core Bond Fund | 4.51% | 4.50% | 4.21% | 3.83% | 3.15% | 2.18% | 4.43% | 3.55% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCOAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.26% | 4.19% | 3.57% | 2.98% | 2.11% | 1.69% | 6.04% | 4.24% | 3.16% | 3.67% | 3.79% | 4.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, HACBX and SCOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCOAX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to HACBX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACBX dropped -18.48% vs SCOAX's -20.12%.
HACBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACBX and SCOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer