PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HACBX vs. HAVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Core Bond Fund (HACBX) and Harbor Large Cap Value Fund (HAVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HACBX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than HAVLX's 0.56% return.


HACBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*

HAVLX

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.14%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HACBX
Harbor Core Bond Fund
0.42%7.02%1.57%5.73%-13.36%-1.66%9.10%8.58%1.75%
HAVLX
Harbor Large Cap Value Fund
0.56%11.07%15.60%19.70%-14.98%24.90%14.46%32.84%-11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between HACBX and HAVLX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.04

Over the past year, HACBX and HAVLX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HACBX vs. HAVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HACBX
HACBX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HACBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HACBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HAVLX
HAVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
HAVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
HAVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Core Bond Fund (HACBX) and Harbor Large Cap Value Fund (HAVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HACBXHAVLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

0.82

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

1.26

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.09

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.90

3.36

+2.55

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HACBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the HAVLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HACBX and HAVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HACBXHAVLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

0.82

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.43

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.58

-0.17

Drawdowns

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HACBX drawdown since its inception was -18.48%, smaller than the maximum HAVLX drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACBX and HAVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HACBXHAVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-53.23%

+34.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-8.83%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.26%

-15.87%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.43%

-23.46%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-4.56%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-6.75%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

2.86%

-1.96%

Volatility

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Core Bond Fund (HACBX) is 1.37%, while Harbor Large Cap Value Fund (HAVLX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that HACBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HACBXHAVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

2.94%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

8.18%

-5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

11.54%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

17.17%

-11.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

18.63%

-13.37%

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HACBX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HAVLX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HACBX vs. HAVLX - Dividend Comparison

HACBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than HAVLX's 21.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HACBX
Harbor Core Bond Fund
4.52%4.50%4.21%3.83%3.15%2.18%4.43%3.55%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAVLX
Harbor Large Cap Value Fund
21.49%21.82%14.78%4.06%5.13%3.33%3.46%0.88%2.84%3.57%4.41%5.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


HACBX and HAVLX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAVLX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to HACBX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACBX dropped -18.48% vs HAVLX's -53.23%.

HACBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HACBX and HAVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer