HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO
HAB.TO (Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF) and RUSB.TO (RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAB.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while RUSB.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by RBC. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAB.TO returned 1.98%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for RUSB.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAB.TO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than RUSB.TO's 3.34% return.
HAB.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
RUSB.TO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- —
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.13% | 7.98% | 7.30% | -9.51% | -1.26% | 8.46% | 7.77% | 0.46% | 0.15% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 3.34% | 1.61% | 13.88% | 3.94% | -0.28% | -0.52% | 1.46% | 2.36% | 7.83% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAB.TO and RUSB.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2017 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAB.TO
RUSB.TO
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) and RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAB.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.81 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 3.97 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than RUSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAB.TO and RUSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAB.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -14.28% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -3.60% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.28% | -5.26% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.20% | -8.10% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.54% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -4.11% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 1.64% | -0.70% |
Volatility
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) is 1.34%, while RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.TO) has a volatility of 2.05%. This indicates that HAB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RUSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAB.TO | RUSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 2.05% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 4.25% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 6.45% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 7.05% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 6.96% | +0.88% |
Dividends
HAB.TO vs. RUSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, which matches RUSB.TO's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.70% | 3.95% | 3.96% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.39% | 3.35% |
RUSB.TO RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 4.13% | 3.96% | 3.38% | 3.26% | 2.48% | 2.30% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 1.90% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAB.TO and RUSB.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAB.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while RUSB.TO is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Global X and RBC.
Find the right allocation for HAB.TO and RUSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer