H50E.L vs. LCPE.L
H50E.L (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - H50E.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, H50E.L returned 11.61%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. H50E.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.
Performance
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H50E.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, H50E.L has outperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 11.61%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.
H50E.L
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
LCPE.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H50E.L HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.58% | 28.02% | 6.20% | 20.06% | -3.33% | 15.58% | 3.30% | 21.72% | -10.53% | 14.39% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 14.20% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 16.28% | 8.38% | 12.94% | -2.26% | 9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between H50E.L and LCPE.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, H50E.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
H50E.L
LCPE.L
-
Industrials
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Technology
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Cyclical
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Consumer Defensive
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Healthcare
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Energy
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Utilities
H50E.L
LCPE.L
-
Basic Materials
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Communication Services
H50E.L
LCPE.L
Real Estate
H50E.L
-
LCPE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
H50E.L
LCPE.L
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H50E.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 4.13 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 13.66 | -8.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H50E.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.44 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 1.04 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.20 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.98 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H50E.L drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H50E.L and LCPE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H50E.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.68% | -27.05% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.49% | -6.66% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.20% | -12.39% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.72% | -12.39% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.50% | -27.05% | -4.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -2.71% | +2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -3.52% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.02% | +1.41% |
Volatility
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that H50E.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H50E.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 3.81% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 8.48% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.11% | 11.29% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 17.74% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 20.60% | -2.61% |
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
H50E.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
H50E.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
H50E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H50E.L HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.77% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 3.04% | 3.50% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 2.63% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
H50E.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H50E.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H50E.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.
H50E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for H50E.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.
Find the right allocation for H50E.L and LCPE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer