PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H412.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZY.DE achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than H412.DE's 15.33% return.


H4ZY.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10Y*

H412.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
7.70%
YTD
15.33%
6M
15.89%
1Y
32.34%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4ZY.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.90%7.98%25.90%20.32%-4.03%
H412.DE
HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD
15.33%6.12%26.73%17.60%-5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZY.DE and H412.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.93

The correlation between H4ZY.DE and H412.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZY.DE
H4ZY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

H412.DE
H412.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
H412.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H412.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
H412.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
H412.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
H412.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H412.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZY.DEH412.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

5.88

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.48

19.52

-5.04

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the H412.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZY.DE and H412.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZY.DEH412.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.90

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.06

+0.06

Drawdowns

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZY.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.94%, smaller than the maximum H412.DE drawdown of -24.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZY.DE and H412.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZY.DEH412.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

-24.35%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-5.54%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.94%

-24.35%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-4.12%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.67%

-0.02%

Volatility

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE) is 2.62%, while HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H412.DE) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that H4ZY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H412.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZY.DEH412.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.27%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

7.70%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

11.23%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

14.70%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

14.81%

-1.32%

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZY.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than H412.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H4ZY.DE vs. H412.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4ZY.DE nor H412.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZY.DE and H412.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H412.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H412.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for H4ZY.DE.

H4ZY.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while H412.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. H4ZY.DE tracks MSCI World, while H412.DE tracks FTSE USA ESG Low Carbon Select. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for H4ZY.DE and 0.12% for H412.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZY.DE and H412.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer