PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZL.DE achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly higher than EEPG.DE's 1.03% return.


H4ZL.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.21%
YTD
12.75%
6M
13.94%
1Y
15.88%
3Y*
9.37%
5Y*
10Y*

EEPG.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
1.79%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.40%
1Y
-2.98%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
-8.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
12.75%-1.48%5.75%6.44%
EEPG.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF
1.03%3.20%-11.23%14.75%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZL.DE and EEPG.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2023

0.59

The correlation between H4ZL.DE and EEPG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZL.DE
H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

EEPG.DE
EEPG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EEPG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEPG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


H4ZL.DEEEPG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.98

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-0.19

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

-0.40

+7.47

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the EEPG.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZL.DE and EEPG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZL.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.11%, smaller than the maximum EEPG.DE drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZL.DE and EEPG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZL.DEEEPG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-52.39%

+32.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.84%

-15.93%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.11%

-23.61%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-40.47%

+40.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.58%

-31.61%

+25.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

7.39%

-5.14%

Volatility

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) is 3.58%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that H4ZL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZL.DEEEPG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

5.22%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

13.93%

-5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

16.82%

-5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.00%

23.51%

-9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.00%

23.95%

-9.95%

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZL.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EEPG.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZL.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while EEPG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZL.DE and EEPG.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZL.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZL.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EEPG.DE.

H4ZL.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while EEPG.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for H4ZL.DE and 0.40% for EEPG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZL.DE and EEPG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer