H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE).

H4ZL.DE and CSYZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H4ZL.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. CSYZ.DE is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. It was launched on Jun 26, 2020. Both H4ZL.DE and CSYZ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD	2.63%	-4.65%	2.27%	6.12%	-20.22%	36.90%	6.19%
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	3.03%	-5.02%	2.47%	4.08%	-19.53%	36.67%	5.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZL.DE achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly lower than CSYZ.DE's 3.03% return.

H4ZL.DE

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -6.17%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: -0.64%
• 3Y*: 2.60%
• 5Y*: 0.73%
• 10Y*: 2.17%

CSYZ.DE

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: -1.01%
• 3Y*: 2.04%
• 5Y*: 0.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZL.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CSYZ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

CSYZ.DE

CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD

H4ZL.DE

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD

Return for Risk

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZL.DE

H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 10
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CSYZ.DE

CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 10
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H4ZL.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	-0.07	+0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	0.00	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.00	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	-0.06	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	-0.20	+0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZL.DE and CSYZ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H4ZL.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	-0.07	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.03	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.22	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZL.DE and CSYZ.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	3.62%	2.19%	3.13%	2.95%	3.29%	3.08%	2.96%	2.67%
CSYZ.DE CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD	1.05%	1.32%	0.00%	0.76%	3.39%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZL.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, which is greater than CSYZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZL.DE and CSYZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4ZL.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.97%	-31.21%	-10.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-12.98%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.45%	-31.21%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.80%	-18.52%	+1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-13.81%	+3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	3.14%	-0.14%

Volatility

H4ZL.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4ZL.DE	CSYZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.53%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	8.08%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	14.40%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.67%	15.03%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	15.31%	+0.97%