PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF Accumulating (SPY2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4Z7.DE achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPY2.DE's 8.38% return.


H4Z7.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
7.83%
6M
7.26%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY2.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
8.38%
6M
7.43%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4Z7.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
7.83%-1.78%5.80%7.39%-13.07%
SPY2.DE
SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF Accumulating
8.38%-2.42%5.09%7.66%-13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between H4Z7.DE and SPY2.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.97

The correlation between H4Z7.DE and SPY2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4Z7.DE
H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY2.DE
SPY2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SPY2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF Accumulating (SPY2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4Z7.DESPY2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.48

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

4.38

-0.38

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the SPY2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4Z7.DE and SPY2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4Z7.DESPY2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.89

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.05

+0.03

Drawdowns

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4Z7.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, smaller than the maximum SPY2.DE drawdown of -42.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z7.DE and SPY2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4Z7.DESPY2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.78%

-42.59%

+15.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-6.86%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-20.14%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-7.69%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-15.50%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.33%

+0.09%

Volatility

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF Accumulating (SPY2.DE) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4Z7.DESPY2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.82%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

8.57%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

11.46%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

15.06%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

19.91%

-5.49%

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4Z7.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY2.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4Z7.DE vs. SPY2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4Z7.DE nor SPY2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, H4Z7.DE and SPY2.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4Z7.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4Z7.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SPY2.DE.

H4Z7.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while SPY2.DE tracks Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for H4Z7.DE and 0.40% for SPY2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4Z7.DE and SPY2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer