H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE).
H4Z7.DE and H4Z6.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H4Z7.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. It was launched on Jul 19, 2022. H4Z6.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jul 12, 2022. Both H4Z7.DE and H4Z6.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4Z7.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.68% | -1.78% | 5.80% | 7.39% | -13.07% |
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.39% | 16.48% | 27.04% | -14.63% | -10.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H4Z7.DE achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than H4Z6.DE's -6.39% return.
H4Z7.DE
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
H4Z6.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -14.69%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4Z7.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than H4Z6.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4Z7.DE
H4Z6.DE
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4Z7.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.28 | -0.04 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 0.09 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.01 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.13 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 0.33 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4Z7.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | -0.04 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.06 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between H4Z7.DE and H4Z6.DE is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither H4Z7.DE nor H4Z6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4Z7.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, smaller than the maximum H4Z6.DE drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z7.DE and H4Z6.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4Z7.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.78% | -33.47% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -15.70% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | -14.69% | +9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -13.93% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 6.31% | -3.77% |
Volatility
H4Z7.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) is 4.72%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that H4Z7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4Z6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| H4Z7.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 6.10% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | 13.41% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 21.47% | -6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 25.46% | -10.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 25.46% | -10.92% |