H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

H4Z3.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and UETE.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - H4Z3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets while UETE.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4Z3.DE returned 21.31%/yr vs 24.38%/yr for UETE.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. H4Z3.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for UETE.DE.

Performance

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4Z3.DE achieves a 29.22% return, which is significantly lower than UETE.DE's 33.28% return.

H4Z3.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.91%
• YTD: 29.22%
• 6M: 31.39%
• 1Y: 48.84%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UETE.DE

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: -1.22%
• YTD: 33.28%
• 6M: 35.72%
• 1Y: 53.68%
• 3Y*: 24.38%
• 5Y*: 9.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	29.22%	18.60%	13.73%	4.66%	-5.78%
UETE.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc	33.28%	21.01%	16.13%	2.59%	-6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2022	0.87

The correlation between H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4Z3.DE

H4Z3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
H4Z3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
H4Z3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
H4Z3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
H4Z3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
H4Z3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 87

UETE.DE

UETE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 90
UETE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
UETE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
UETE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
UETE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
UETE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	H4Z3.DE	UETE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	2.63	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	3.43	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.47	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.66	5.60	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.86	18.02	-2.16

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4Z3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the UETE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4Z3.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum UETE.DE drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4Z3.DE	UETE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.86%	-39.65%	+20.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-9.43%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-20.18%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-6.41%	+2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-11.50%	+6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	2.94%	+0.13%

Volatility

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets SRI UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (UETE.DE) at 8.51%. This indicates that H4Z3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UETE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4Z3.DE	UETE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.02%	8.51%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.79%	17.38%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.12%	20.06%	-0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	18.33%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.19%	21.09%	-4.90%

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4Z3.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UETE.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

H4Z3.DE vs. UETE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4Z3.DE nor UETE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, H4Z3.DE or UETE.DE?

On fees, H4Z3.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H4Z3.DE or UETE.DE?

H4Z3.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for UETE.DE.

What is the main difference between H4Z3.DE and UETE.DE?

H4Z3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while UETE.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for H4Z3.DE and 0.24% for UETE.DE.