H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

H41E.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AE5A.DE (Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - H41E.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select while AE5A.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H41E.DE returned 27.78%/yr vs 20.90%/yr for AE5A.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. H41E.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for AE5A.DE.

Performance

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H41E.DE achieves a 39.52% return, which is significantly higher than AE5A.DE's 27.41% return.

H41E.DE

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 8.62%
• YTD: 39.52%
• 6M: 41.09%
• 1Y: 68.44%
• 3Y*: 27.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AE5A.DE

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 27.41%
• 6M: 28.14%
• 1Y: 48.94%
• 3Y*: 20.90%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: 9.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
H41E.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	39.52%	22.02%	17.74%	11.43%	-2.00%
AE5A.DE Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist	27.41%	19.26%	14.36%	5.58%	-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between H41E.DE and AE5A.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.92

The correlation between H41E.DE and AE5A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H41E.DE

H41E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
H41E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
H41E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
H41E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
H41E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

AE5A.DE

AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H41E.DE	AE5A.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.91	2.79	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.00	3.72	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.50	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.09	4.80	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.00	17.35	+7.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is higher than the AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H41E.DE and AE5A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H41E.DE	AE5A.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.91	2.79	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.56	0.42	+1.14

Drawdowns

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H41E.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.92%, smaller than the maximum AE5A.DE drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H41E.DE and AE5A.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H41E.DE	AE5A.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.92%	-36.16%	+15.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.80%	-10.34%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.92%	-19.22%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-2.56%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-9.72%	+6.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	2.87%	-0.08%

Volatility

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) at 7.32%. This indicates that H41E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AE5A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H41E.DE	AE5A.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	7.32%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	14.97%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.80%	17.82%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	17.23%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	19.05%	-2.99%

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H41E.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AE5A.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

H41E.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Dividend Comparison

H41E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AE5A.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AE5A.DE Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist	1.69%	2.15%	3.38%	3.80%	2.44%	1.62%	1.71%	2.01%	2.17%
H41E.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H41E.DE and AE5A.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, H41E.DE and AE5A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, H41E.DE or AE5A.DE?

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H41E.DE or AE5A.DE?

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for H41E.DE.

What is the main difference between H41E.DE and AE5A.DE?

H41E.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select, while AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for H41E.DE and 0.14% for AE5A.DE.