H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE
H41C.DE (HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - H41C.DE tracks the FTSE Developed ESG Low Carbon Select while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, H41C.DE returned 12.71%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for F50A.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. H41C.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H41C.DE achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than F50A.DE's 10.81% return.
H41C.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 29.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H41C.DE HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 14.28% | 10.36% | 21.66% | 16.26% | -12.60% | 32.89% | 10.42% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.81% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | 11.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between H41C.DE and F50A.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between H41C.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H41C.DE
F50A.DE
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H41C.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H41C.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.40 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.90 | 3.66 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.75 | 14.61 | +5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H41C.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 2.17 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.88 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.71 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H41C.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.76%, smaller than the maximum F50A.DE drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H41C.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H41C.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.76% | -32.88% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -6.62% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.76% | -21.49% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | -21.49% | +0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.39% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -4.72% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 1.66% | -0.19% |
Volatility
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
HSBC Developed World Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (H41C.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that H41C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H41C.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.63% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 7.95% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 11.18% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 14.60% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 17.70% | -4.35% |
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H41C.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
H41C.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither H41C.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, H41C.DE and F50A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for H41C.DE.
H41C.DE tracks FTSE Developed ESG Low Carbon Select, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for H41C.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for H41C.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer