H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

H411.DE (HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD) and DBX5.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - H411.DE tracks the MSCI AC Far East ex Japan while DBX5.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, H411.DE returned 11.02%/yr vs 22.04%/yr for DBX5.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. H411.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DBX5.DE.

Performance

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (H411.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H411.DE achieves a 37.68% return, which is significantly lower than DBX5.DE's 69.45% return. Over the past 10 years, H411.DE has underperformed DBX5.DE with an annualized return of 11.02%, while DBX5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 22.04% annualized return.

H411.DE

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 37.68%
• 6M: 38.70%
• 1Y: 67.18%
• 3Y*: 25.29%
• 5Y*: 9.18%
• 10Y*: 11.02%

DBX5.DE

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: 12.70%
• YTD: 69.45%
• 6M: 72.00%
• 1Y: 110.55%
• 3Y*: 40.65%
• 5Y*: 22.99%
• 10Y*: 22.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
H411.DE HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD	37.68%	25.21%	18.89%	-1.55%	-16.07%	-1.90%	13.55%	22.02%	-11.68%	24.72%
DBX5.DE Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C	69.45%	18.33%	31.08%	24.15%	-25.19%	37.79%	24.51%	39.18%	-5.55%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between H411.DE and DBX5.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013	0.78

The correlation between H411.DE and DBX5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H411.DE

H411.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
H411.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
H411.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
H411.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
H411.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
H411.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

DBX5.DE

DBX5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 96
DBX5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
DBX5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DBX5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DBX5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DBX5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (H411.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H411.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	4.62	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	5.37	-2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.74	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	12.09	-8.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	35.84	-26.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H411.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is lower than the DBX5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H411.DE and DBX5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H411.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	4.62	-2.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	1.05	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	1.06	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.54	-0.06

Drawdowns

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H411.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, smaller than the maximum DBX5.DE drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H411.DE and DBX5.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H411.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.70%	-55.28%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.51%	-9.23%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.17%	-30.81%	+7.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.49%	-32.62%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.70%	-32.62%	-6.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.25%	-1.97%	-1.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-11.61%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.07%	3.12%	+3.95%

Volatility

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (H411.DE) is 8.34%, while Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that H411.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBX5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H411.DE	DBX5.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.34%	10.28%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.24%	19.59%	-3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.65%	24.18%	+4.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.66%	21.58%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	20.55%	-0.11%

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H411.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX5.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

H411.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H411.DE nor DBX5.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H411.DE and DBX5.DE in my portfolio?

H411.DE and DBX5.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, H411.DE or DBX5.DE?

On fees, H411.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H411.DE or DBX5.DE?

H411.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DBX5.DE.

What is the main difference between H411.DE and DBX5.DE?

H411.DE tracks MSCI AC Far East ex Japan, while DBX5.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for H411.DE and 0.65% for DBX5.DE.