PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GYLD vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GYLD vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GYLD

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
7.91%
6M
10.25%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
4.68%

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GYLD vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


GYLD vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GYLD
DWAT

Real Estate

34.8%
5.1%

Energy

30.0%
4.2%

Financial Services

12.0%
27.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%
2.6%

Utilities

4.6%
5.3%

Industrials

4.3%
25.1%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
6.5%

Healthcare

-

5.3%

Technology

-

10.2%

Real Estate

GYLD
34.8%
DWAT
5.1%

Energy

GYLD
30.0%
DWAT
4.2%

Financial Services

GYLD
12.0%
DWAT
27.2%

Basic Materials

GYLD
7.5%
DWAT
2.6%

Utilities

GYLD
4.6%
DWAT
5.3%

Industrials

GYLD
4.3%
DWAT
25.1%

Communication Services

GYLD
2.7%
DWAT
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

GYLD
2.5%
DWAT
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

GYLD
1.6%
DWAT
6.5%

Healthcare

GYLD

-

DWAT
5.3%

Technology

GYLD

-

DWAT
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GYLD vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GYLD
GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GYLD vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GYLDDWATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

GYLD vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GYLDDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

Drawdowns

GYLD vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and DWAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GYLDDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

0.00%

-55.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

0.00%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.41%

0.00%

-14.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

Volatility

GYLD vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GYLDDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

0.00%

+12.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

0.00%

+13.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

0.00%

+16.58%

GYLD vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

GYLD vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.37%8.43%12.90%7.13%4.64%5.50%7.42%5.83%8.17%6.78%7.29%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, GYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

GYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 1.83% for DWAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GYLD and DWAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer