GYLD vs. DWAT
GYLD (Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GYLD is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Yield, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. GYLD is passively managed, while DWAT is actively managed. GYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
GYLD vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GYLD
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GYLD vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | 5.17% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
GYLD vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GYLD
DWAT
Real Estate
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
GYLD
DWAT
Energy
GYLD
DWAT
Financial Services
GYLD
DWAT
Basic Materials
GYLD
DWAT
Utilities
GYLD
DWAT
Industrials
GYLD
DWAT
Communication Services
GYLD
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
GYLD
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
GYLD
DWAT
Healthcare
GYLD
-
DWAT
Technology
GYLD
-
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GYLD vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
GYLD
DWAT
GYLD vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GYLD | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GYLD | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | — | — |
Drawdowns
GYLD vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GYLD | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | 0.00% | -55.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | 0.00% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | 0.00% | -14.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility
GYLD vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GYLD | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 0.00% | +12.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 0.00% | +13.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 0.00% | +16.58% |
GYLD vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
GYLD vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | 7.37% | 8.43% | 12.90% | 7.13% | 4.64% | 5.50% | 7.42% | 5.83% | 8.17% | 6.78% | 7.29% | 10.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
GYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for GYLD and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer