PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXXIX vs. AHYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) and abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXXIX achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than AHYMX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GXXIX has outperformed AHYMX with an annualized return of 14.68%, while AHYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return.


GXXIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.75%
YTD
6.22%
6M
5.19%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
14.68%

AHYMX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.64%
1Y
5.02%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
0.18%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
6.22%3.82%10.11%15.19%-26.55%81.37%29.56%36.96%-6.73%20.42%
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
1.07%2.91%4.07%1.56%-9.36%4.06%1.81%5.23%1.50%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GXXIX and AHYMX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.03

The correlation between GXXIX and AHYMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXXIX vs. AHYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXXIX
GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYMX
AHYMX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AHYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) and abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXXIXAHYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.66

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

9.51

-5.52

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the AHYMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXXIX and AHYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXXIXAHYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.98

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.06

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.60

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.96

-0.31

Drawdowns

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXXIX drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, which is greater than AHYMX's maximum drawdown of -11.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXXIX and AHYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXXIXAHYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.65%

-11.53%

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-1.98%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-4.53%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.65%

-11.53%

-22.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-11.53%

-22.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.53%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-2.49%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

0.55%

+2.51%

Volatility

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) at 1.15%. This indicates that GXXIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXXIXAHYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

1.15%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

1.93%

+7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

2.66%

+9.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.77%

2.93%

+24.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

2.61%

+21.11%

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXXIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYMX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXXIX vs. AHYMX - Dividend Comparison

GXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than AHYMX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
4.56%4.52%3.32%2.21%2.05%2.31%2.74%3.10%3.39%2.82%3.28%3.43%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
2.16%2.30%0.00%0.28%0.39%59.39%14.10%9.76%12.93%10.11%12.20%5.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXXIX and AHYMX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXXIX has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to AHYMX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXXIX dropped -33.65% vs AHYMX's -11.53%.

AHYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXXIX and AHYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer