PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GNOM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLV.L is traded in GBP, while GNOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GNOM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLV.L achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than GNOM.L's 19.53% return.


GXLV.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.91%
6M
3.34%
YTD
4.49%
1Y
22.45%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
6.42%

GNOM.L

1D
-1.55%
1M
3.78%
6M
12.47%
YTD
19.53%
1Y
57.17%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GXLV.L
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
4.49%7.08%3.73%-3.91%-18.87%5.78%
GNOM.L
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
19.53%10.80%-16.55%-10.48%-29.74%-8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLV.L and GNOM.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLV.L
GXLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GXLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GNOM.L
GNOM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GNOM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNOM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L) and Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GNOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXLV.LGNOM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.35

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

8.35

-3.50

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the GNOM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLV.L and GNOM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLV.L drawdown since its inception was -31.32%, smaller than the maximum GNOM.L drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLV.L and GNOM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLV.LGNOM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-67.55%

+36.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.51%

-16.99%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-45.06%

+25.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.88%

-38.02%

+28.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-43.90%

+33.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

6.82%

-2.18%

Volatility

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLV.L) is 5.69%, while Global X Genomics & Biotechnology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GNOM.L) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that GXLV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GNOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLV.LGNOM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

8.65%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

21.54%

-10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

29.25%

-13.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.80%

32.06%

-14.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

32.06%

-14.10%

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLV.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GNOM.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLV.L vs. GNOM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLV.L nor GNOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLV.L and GNOM.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLV.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLV.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GNOM.L.

GXLV.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GNOM.L is Genomics. GXLV.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while GNOM.L tracks Solactive Genomics v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLV.L and 0.50% for GNOM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLV.L and GNOM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer