GXIG vs. VCLT
GXIG (Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. GXIG is actively managed, while VCLT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXIG charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
GXIG vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXIG achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 0.99% return.
GXIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
GXIG vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.33% | 4.43% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXIG and VCLT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXIG vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
GXIG
VCLT
GXIG vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GXIG) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.39 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
GXIG vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXIG drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXIG and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -34.31% | +31.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -14.36% | +12.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -8.16% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
GXIG vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 7.92% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 12.78% | -7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 12.84% | -7.06% |
GXIG vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXIG has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXIG vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
GXIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than VCLT's 5.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXIG Global X Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 5.91% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.55% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXIG and VCLT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GXIG.
GXIG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 5.55% for VCLT.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GXIG and 0.04% for VCLT.
Find the right allocation for GXIG and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer