PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWX vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWX vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWX achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 7.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GWX has underperformed ISCF with an annualized return of 7.57%, while ISCF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


GWX

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.79%
6M
14.68%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
7.57%

ISCF

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.28%
6M
10.16%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWX vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
11.79%35.89%0.21%10.94%-19.98%9.66%13.41%18.18%-18.97%28.88%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.28%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%26.32%-18.76%38.13%

Correlation

The correlation between GWX and ISCF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015

0.86

The correlation between GWX and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GWX vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GWX
ISCF

Industrials

22.0%
23.3%

Technology

15.1%
10.5%

Basic Materials

14.5%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.4%

Financial Services

7.8%
12.3%

Real Estate

7.2%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.1%

Energy

4.7%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.8%

Utilities

1.3%
3.6%

Industrials

GWX
22.0%
ISCF
23.3%

Technology

GWX
15.1%
ISCF
10.5%

Basic Materials

GWX
14.5%
ISCF
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GWX
11.2%
ISCF
12.4%

Healthcare

GWX
8.5%
ISCF
5.4%

Financial Services

GWX
7.8%
ISCF
12.3%

Real Estate

GWX
7.2%
ISCF
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

GWX
4.7%
ISCF
4.1%

Energy

GWX
4.7%
ISCF
4.8%

Communication Services

GWX
2.9%
ISCF
3.8%

Utilities

GWX
1.3%
ISCF
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWX vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWX
GWX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWX vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWXISCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.28

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.94

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

7.28

+2.75

GWX vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWX and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWXISCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.54

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.44

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.53

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.49

-0.26

Drawdowns

GWX vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWX drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, which is greater than ISCF's maximum drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWX and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWXISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.25%

-40.79%

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-11.34%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-13.85%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.58%

-30.70%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-40.79%

-4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-2.64%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-8.14%

-6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.02%

+0.04%

Volatility

GWX vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) at 4.33%. This indicates that GWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWXISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.33%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

11.86%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

14.39%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

16.66%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.44%

-0.08%

GWX vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GWX and ISCF have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

GWX vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

GWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than ISCF's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
2.54%2.83%2.71%2.64%2.71%2.75%1.74%3.41%2.94%5.18%4.21%2.67%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.50%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GWX and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWX dropped -63.25% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 9.19% vs 7.57% for GWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GWX and ISCF have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.54% for GWX.

GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index, while ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

GWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWX and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer