PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWPCX vs. AGTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWPCX achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than AGTHX's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GWPCX has underperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.97% annualized return.


GWPCX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.55%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.36%
1Y
27.13%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
12.55%

AGTHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.81%
YTD
10.09%
6M
9.70%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
15.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWPCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
10.95%19.58%19.26%27.77%-27.51%17.70%24.46%26.74%-7.31%24.19%
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
10.09%19.73%28.02%37.22%-30.75%19.32%37.83%28.16%-3.15%26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GWPCX and AGTHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.97

The correlation between GWPCX and AGTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWPCX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWPCX
GWPCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GWPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AGTHX
AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWPCXAGTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

1.95

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

7.61

+2.72

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWPCX and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWPCXAGTHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.77

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.71

0.00

Drawdowns

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWPCX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum AGTHX drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPCX and AGTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWPCXAGTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-51.91%

+17.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-13.76%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.49%

-21.57%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-36.38%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-36.38%

+1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-9.20%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.52%

-0.83%

Volatility

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWPCXAGTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.67%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

11.65%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

15.15%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

20.25%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

19.69%

-1.66%

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWPCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AGTHX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWPCX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

GWPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than AGTHX's 9.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGTHX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A
9.71%10.69%8.99%7.40%4.05%8.18%4.30%7.15%11.99%7.03%6.61%8.87%
GWPCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
5.08%5.63%5.59%0.96%9.93%3.48%3.04%5.54%5.45%2.73%3.67%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GWPCX and AGTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWPCX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to AGTHX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPCX dropped -34.59% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

GWPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWPCX and AGTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer