PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWMEX vs. BRWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund (GWMEX) and AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWMEX achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than BRWIX's 15.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GWMEX has underperformed BRWIX with an annualized return of 3.40%, while BRWIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.


GWMEX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.40%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
3.40%

BRWIX

1D
1.77%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.59%
6M
15.59%
1Y
35.06%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
5.41%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWMEX
AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund
2.65%2.50%2.61%10.89%-17.86%15.05%6.32%12.51%-0.06%9.79%
BRWIX
AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund
15.59%21.16%3.08%13.75%-25.35%12.38%29.77%27.98%-3.67%23.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GWMEX and BRWIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

-0.04

The correlation between GWMEX and BRWIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWMEX vs. BRWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWMEX
GWMEX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GWMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GWMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BRWIX
BRWIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BRWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BRWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund (GWMEX) and AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWMEXBRWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.41

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.08

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.78

13.56

-5.78

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWMEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the BRWIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWMEX and BRWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWMEX drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum BRWIX drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWMEX and BRWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWMEXBRWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.30%

-54.49%

+18.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.95%

-11.28%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.08%

-20.82%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

-36.71%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.06%

-36.71%

+12.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.63%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-17.57%

+11.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.56%

-1.45%

Volatility

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund (GWMEX) is 0.91%, while AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (BRWIX) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that GWMEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWMEXBRWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

6.19%

-5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

12.79%

-9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

15.18%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.80%

18.29%

-10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

20.22%

-13.47%

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWMEX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BRWIX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWMEX vs. BRWIX - Dividend Comparison

GWMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than BRWIX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRWIX
AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund
0.65%0.75%1.17%0.63%0.48%45.72%14.71%10.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GWMEX
AMG GW&K Municipal Enhanced Yield Fund
3.40%3.67%3.38%3.10%3.33%13.26%3.63%4.59%5.82%2.97%7.96%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWMEX and BRWIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRWIX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to GWMEX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWMEX dropped -36.30% vs BRWIX's -54.49%.

BRWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWMEX and BRWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer