PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVMCX vs. DNLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Government Street Opportunities Fund (GVMCX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVMCX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than DNLDX's 15.00% return. Over the past 10 years, GVMCX has outperformed DNLDX with an annualized return of 13.15%, while DNLDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.


GVMCX

1D
1.94%
1M
-1.53%
6M
6.45%
YTD
11.23%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
13.15%
ALL TIME*
10.86%

DNLDX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.66%
6M
11.95%
YTD
15.00%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
10.07%
ALL TIME*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVMCX
Government Street Opportunities Fund
11.23%14.52%19.68%15.19%-14.16%30.14%17.99%31.00%-8.88%20.22%
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
15.00%9.79%22.27%16.99%-14.34%26.49%9.29%16.82%-14.46%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GVMCX and DNLDX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.95

The correlation between GVMCX and DNLDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVMCX vs. DNLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVMCX
GVMCX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GVMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GVMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DNLDX
DNLDX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DNLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DNLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Government Street Opportunities Fund (GVMCX) and BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVMCXDNLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.61

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

9.77

-2.97

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the DNLDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVMCX and DNLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVMCX drawdown since its inception was -47.77%, smaller than the maximum DNLDX drawdown of -63.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVMCX and DNLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVMCXDNLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.77%

-63.69%

+15.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-7.29%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.29%

-20.42%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-23.42%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.67%

-42.23%

+7.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-0.65%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-9.60%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.95%

+0.37%

Volatility

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Volatility Comparison

Government Street Opportunities Fund (GVMCX) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund (DNLDX) at 2.77%. This indicates that GVMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVMCXDNLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

2.77%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

10.01%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

13.48%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

18.50%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.46%

19.46%

-2.00%

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVMCX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than DNLDX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVMCX vs. DNLDX - Dividend Comparison

GVMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than DNLDX's 13.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DNLDX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap Fund
13.06%14.15%15.24%1.69%8.82%17.74%2.77%2.65%11.14%11.32%1.00%3.12%
GVMCX
Government Street Opportunities Fund
2.09%3.80%5.42%1.91%4.43%3.36%3.35%4.68%2.00%4.84%4.54%5.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVMCX and DNLDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVMCX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to DNLDX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVMCX dropped -47.77% vs DNLDX's -63.69%.

DNLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVMCX and DNLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer