GVLU vs. VTV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV).

GVLU and VTV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GVLU is an actively managed fund by Gotham. It was launched on Jun 7, 2022. VTV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Prime Market Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.

Performance

GVLU vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GVLU vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	2.72%	11.24%	11.09%	18.02%	-3.80%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	3.30%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	0.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLU achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 3.30% return.

GVLU

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -4.93%
• YTD: 2.72%
• 6M: 5.75%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 14.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: 3.30%
• 6M: 6.34%
• 1Y: 16.02%
• 3Y*: 15.09%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLU vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

GVLU

Gotham 1000 Value ETF

VTV

Vanguard Value ETF

Return for Risk

GVLU vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVLU

GVLU Risk / Return Rank: 50
GVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
GVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 54

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 67
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVLU vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GVLU	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.08	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.56	-0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	1.53	-0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.22	6.93	-1.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GVLU vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVLU and VTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GVLU	VTV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.08	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.79	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.49	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between GVLU and VTV is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GVLU vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

GVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than VTV's 2.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF	6.27%	6.44%	2.88%	1.62%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	2.02%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Drawdowns

GVLU vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLU drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLU and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVLU	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.82%	-59.27%	+38.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.62%	-11.32%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.46%	-4.81%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-7.92%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	2.50%	+0.82%

Volatility

GVLU vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.78%. This indicates that GVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVLU	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.78%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	7.72%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.64%	14.93%	+4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.04%	13.88%	+4.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	16.67%	+1.37%