PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVLU vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVLU vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLU achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.


GVLU

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.02%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.83%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
10Y*

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVLU vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GVLU
Gotham 1000 Value ETF
6.95%11.24%11.09%18.02%-3.80%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GVLU and VTV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.88

The correlation between GVLU and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVLU vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVLU
VTV

Consumer Cyclical

16.1%
4.0%

Financial Services

15.9%
22.3%

Technology

14.5%
13.4%

Energy

11.4%
8.1%

Industrials

11.2%
14.0%

Healthcare

10.8%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

10.3%
9.4%

Basic Materials

5.2%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.5%
2.8%

Utilities

0.4%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GVLU
16.1%
VTV
4.0%

Financial Services

GVLU
15.9%
VTV
22.3%

Technology

GVLU
14.5%
VTV
13.4%

Energy

GVLU
11.4%
VTV
8.1%

Industrials

GVLU
11.2%
VTV
14.0%

Healthcare

GVLU
10.8%
VTV
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

GVLU
10.3%
VTV
9.4%

Basic Materials

GVLU
5.2%
VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

GVLU
3.7%
VTV
3.3%

Real Estate

GVLU
0.5%
VTV
2.8%

Utilities

GVLU
0.4%
VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVLU vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVLU
GVLU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVLU vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVLUVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

4.15

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.40

15.69

-8.29

GVLU vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVLU and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVLUVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.61

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.51

+0.09

Drawdowns

GVLU vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLU drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLU and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVLUVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-59.27%

+38.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-6.35%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.82%

-14.52%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

0.00%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-7.87%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

1.68%

+0.84%

Volatility

GVLU vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that GVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVLUVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

2.52%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

7.55%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

10.11%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

13.88%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

16.67%

+1.12%

GVLU vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVLU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVLU vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

GVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVLU
Gotham 1000 Value ETF
6.02%6.44%2.88%1.62%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVLU and VTV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVLU has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVLU dropped -20.82% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 3-year performance, VTV leads with 18.28% vs 15.80% for GVLU. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VTV has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 15.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GVLU.

GVLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

GVLU is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GVLU and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVLU and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer