GVLU vs. DBO
GVLU (Gotham 1000 Value ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GVLU is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Gotham, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. GVLU is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GVLU returned 15.80%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GVLU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
GVLU vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVLU achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
GVLU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
GVLU vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF | 6.95% | 11.24% | 11.09% | 18.02% | -3.80% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | -27.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVLU and DBO is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between GVLU and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GVLU vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVLU
DBO
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
GVLU
DBO
-
Financial Services
GVLU
DBO
Technology
GVLU
DBO
-
Energy
GVLU
DBO
-
Industrials
GVLU
DBO
-
Healthcare
GVLU
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
GVLU
DBO
-
Basic Materials
GVLU
DBO
-
Communication Services
GVLU
DBO
-
Real Estate
GVLU
DBO
-
Utilities
GVLU
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVLU vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
GVLU
DBO
GVLU vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVLU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 4.44 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 9.02 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVLU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.34 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.02 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
GVLU vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVLU drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLU and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVLU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -90.18% | +69.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -18.19% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.82% | -28.20% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -51.38% | +49.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -62.25% | +58.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 8.92% | -6.40% |
Volatility
GVLU vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) is 3.03%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that GVLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVLU | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 12.61% | -9.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 28.20% | -19.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 34.46% | -21.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 32.29% | -14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 31.78% | -13.99% |
GVLU vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVLU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVLU vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
GVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
GVLU Gotham 1000 Value ETF | 6.02% | 6.44% | 2.88% | 1.62% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVLU and DBO have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to GVLU (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVLU dropped -20.82% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 15.80% for GVLU. On fees, GVLU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GVLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 15.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVLU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
GVLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.02%, compared with 1.90% for DBO.
GVLU is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Gotham and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GVLU and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVLU and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer