PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVLE vs. BGIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVLE vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVLE achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 14.06% return.


GVLE

1D
2.16%
1M
2.61%
6M
16.20%
YTD
18.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BGIG

1D
0.22%
1M
1.70%
6M
10.58%
YTD
14.06%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.13M$3.60M$4.30M
$50.89K$151.90K$80.35K

GVLE vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GVLE and BGIG is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVLE vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVLE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BGIG
BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVLE vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVLEBGIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

GVLE vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVLE vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVLE drawdown since its inception was -7.88%, smaller than the maximum BGIG drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVLE and BGIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVLEBGIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-13.24%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.16%

-1.69%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

Volatility

GVLE vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVLEBGIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

8.95%

+5.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

11.75%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.05%

11.75%

+2.30%

GVLE vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GVLE and BGIG have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

GVLE vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

GVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than BGIG's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BGIG
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
1.69%1.89%2.02%0.78%
GVLE
Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF
0.98%1.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVLE and BGIG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GVLE and BGIG have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

BGIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.98% for GVLE.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Bahl & Gaynor.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVLE and BGIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer