PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVALX vs. NEIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVALX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 17.29% return.


GVALX

1D
0.13%
1M
3.01%
YTD
9.53%
6M
11.01%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*

NEIMX

1D
1.26%
1M
4.85%
YTD
17.29%
6M
17.10%
1Y
34.32%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GVALX
Gotham Large Value Fund
9.53%13.83%11.88%11.74%-6.84%28.96%3.42%12.79%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
17.29%18.68%13.50%6.15%-5.16%23.85%-5.97%12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between GVALX and NEIMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.88

The correlation between GVALX and NEIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVALX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVALX
GVALX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NEIMX
NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVALXNEIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.63

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

6.10

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

25.48

-15.45

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVALX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVALXNEIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.45

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.02

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.03

+0.55

Drawdowns

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVALX drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVALX and NEIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVALXNEIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.56%

-92.94%

+54.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-5.75%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-92.94%

+77.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.68%

-92.94%

+74.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-88.99%

+88.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-10.51%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.37%

+0.78%

Volatility

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 2.72%. This indicates that GVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVALXNEIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.72%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

7.81%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.03%

10.18%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

576.30%

-560.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

407.70%

-388.19%

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVALX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVALX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

GVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVALX
Gotham Large Value Fund
10.78%11.81%10.72%9.77%7.59%18.49%1.61%2.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NEIMX
Neiman Large Cap Value Fund
0.65%0.76%1.10%1.36%3.60%17.65%1.20%2.26%1.20%6.64%10.20%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVALX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVALX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to NEIMX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVALX dropped -38.56% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVALX and NEIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer