GVALX vs. NEIMX
GVALX (Gotham Large Value Fund) and NEIMX (Neiman Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GVALX returned 9.39%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for NEIMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVALX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for NEIMX.
Performance
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVALX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 17.29% return.
GVALX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- —
NEIMX
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 17.29%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- 1Y
- 34.32%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVALX Gotham Large Value Fund | 9.53% | 13.83% | 11.88% | 11.74% | -6.84% | 28.96% | 3.42% | 12.79% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 17.29% | 18.68% | 13.50% | 6.15% | -5.16% | 23.85% | -5.97% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVALX and NEIMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GVALX and NEIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVALX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank
GVALX
NEIMX
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVALX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.63 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 6.10 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.03 | 25.48 | -15.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVALX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 3.45 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.02 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.03 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVALX drawdown since its inception was -38.56%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVALX and NEIMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVALX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.56% | -92.94% | +54.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.46% | -5.75% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -92.94% | +77.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.68% | -92.94% | +74.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -88.99% | +88.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -10.51% | +6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.37% | +0.78% |
Volatility
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison
Gotham Large Value Fund (GVALX) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) at 2.72%. This indicates that GVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVALX | NEIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.72% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 7.81% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.03% | 10.18% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 576.30% | -560.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 407.70% | -388.19% |
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVALX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVALX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison
GVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVALX Gotham Large Value Fund | 10.78% | 11.81% | 10.72% | 9.77% | 7.59% | 18.49% | 1.61% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund | 0.65% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 1.36% | 3.60% | 17.65% | 1.20% | 2.26% | 1.20% | 6.64% | 10.20% | 4.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVALX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVALX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to NEIMX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVALX dropped -38.56% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.
NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVALX and NEIMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer