PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUG vs. GTAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUG vs. GTAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUG achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than GTAIX's 12.59% return.


GUG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.28%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
10Y*

GTAIX

1D
0.78%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.59%
6M
13.16%
1Y
22.76%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUG vs. GTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
7.15%13.12%11.46%20.68%-26.55%-0.20%
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
12.59%13.49%8.39%15.59%-14.49%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GUG and GTAIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2021

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUG vs. GTAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUG
GUG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GTAIX
GTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUG vs. GTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) and Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUGGTAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.55

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

5.19

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

22.04

-16.85

GUG vs. GTAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the GTAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUG and GTAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUGGTAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

2.88

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.50

-0.27

Drawdowns

GUG vs. GTAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUG drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than GTAIX's maximum drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUG and GTAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUGGTAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-24.25%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-4.51%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.10%

-11.89%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

0.00%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-4.82%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.06%

+1.57%

Volatility

GUG vs. GTAIX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) at 2.73%. This indicates that GUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUGGTAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.73%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

6.81%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

8.14%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

10.72%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

11.50%

+6.02%

GUG vs. GTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUG has a 3.86% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAIX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUG vs. GTAIX - Dividend Comparison

GUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, more than GTAIX's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
4.90%5.82%3.38%2.69%1.65%2.35%0.82%1.77%1.92%
GUG
Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund
9.01%9.30%9.58%9.72%9.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUG and GTAIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUG has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to GTAIX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUG dropped -32.78% vs GTAIX's -24.25%.

GTAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUG and GTAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer