GTSOX vs. BUIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX).
GTSOX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Jun 29, 2010. BUIGX is managed by CBOE Vest. It was launched on Aug 22, 2016.
Performance
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTSOX Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio | -0.07% | 7.73% | 13.79% | 14.59% | -11.69% | 18.06% | 4.22% | 18.45% | -4.68% | 5.43% |
BUIGX Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund | -2.01% | 11.51% | 15.54% | 19.05% | -9.88% | 12.51% | 10.57% | 17.71% | -2.19% | 11.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTSOX achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly higher than BUIGX's -2.01% return.
GTSOX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 10.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
BUIGX
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTSOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUIGX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTSOX vs. BUIGX — Risk / Return Rank
GTSOX
BUIGX
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) and Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTSOX | BUIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.51 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 1.31 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | 7.25 | -1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTSOX | BUIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.70 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.74 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTSOX and BUIGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Dividend Comparison
GTSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, while BUIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTSOX Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio | 7.47% | 7.47% | 12.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.35% | 0.00% | 7.56% | 2.62% | 6.57% | 5.01% | 5.95% |
BUIGX Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTSOX drawdown since its inception was -29.21%, which is greater than BUIGX's maximum drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSOX and BUIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTSOX | BUIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.21% | -22.01% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -8.91% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -15.22% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -3.22% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -2.36% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility
GTSOX vs. BUIGX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Secured Options Portfolio (GTSOX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Cboe Vest US Large Cap 10% Buffer Fund (BUIGX) at 3.66%. This indicates that GTSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTSOX | BUIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 3.66% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 8.09% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 13.97% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.19% | 11.53% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.44% | 11.77% | +1.67% |