PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTSAX vs. NESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTSAX achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 66.68% return.


GTSAX

1D
2.86%
1M
-4.91%
6M
12.82%
YTD
17.05%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
11.20%

NESIX

1D
4.16%
1M
-3.00%
6M
51.22%
YTD
66.68%
1Y
86.80%
3Y*
30.01%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTSAX
Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund
17.05%5.80%16.19%12.66%-35.61%5.71%57.23%24.30%-9.16%24.94%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
66.68%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GTSAX and NESIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.84

The correlation between GTSAX and NESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTSAX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTSAX
GTSAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GTSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTSAXNESIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.91

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

14.80

-9.48

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTSAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the NESIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSAX and NESIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSAX drawdown since its inception was -63.62%, which is greater than NESIX's maximum drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSAX and NESIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTSAXNESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.62%

-49.61%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.21%

-22.10%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-35.21%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.85%

-49.61%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-10.93%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

-14.87%

-4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

5.83%

-1.13%

Volatility

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) is 9.47%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 13.33%. This indicates that GTSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTSAXNESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

13.33%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.86%

26.44%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.52%

34.45%

-7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.19%

30.25%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

26.89%

-2.40%

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTSAX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison

GTSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTSAX
Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund
8.92%10.45%0.00%0.00%3.60%38.91%13.85%8.96%9.76%9.23%9.35%10.11%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTSAX and NESIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NESIX has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to GTSAX (9.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSAX dropped -63.62% vs NESIX's -49.61%.

NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTSAX and NESIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer