PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTSAX vs. DMCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTSAX achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 26.95% return. Over the past 10 years, GTSAX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.94% annualized return.


GTSAX

1D
-3.20%
1M
4.58%
YTD
25.26%
6M
22.06%
1Y
37.60%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
11.35%

DMCRX

1D
-1.74%
1M
3.19%
YTD
26.95%
6M
23.26%
1Y
74.78%
3Y*
30.70%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*
22.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTSAX
Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund
25.26%5.80%16.19%12.66%-35.61%5.71%57.23%24.30%-9.16%24.94%
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
26.95%31.17%30.58%11.47%-33.54%22.23%86.43%34.03%2.52%24.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GTSAX and DMCRX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.90

The correlation between GTSAX and DMCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTSAX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSAX
GTSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GTSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DMCRX
DMCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DMCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DMCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTSAXDMCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

5.15

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.64

17.87

-7.23

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the DMCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSAX and DMCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSAX drawdown since its inception was -63.62%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -46.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSAX and DMCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTSAXDMCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.62%

-46.68%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-15.46%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-34.92%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.85%

-46.68%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-46.68%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-1.74%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-14.79%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

4.44%

-0.73%

Volatility

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) have volatilities of 10.22% and 10.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTSAXDMCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.22%

10.53%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.22%

22.51%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

29.72%

-4.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

28.66%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

28.03%

-3.70%

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTSAX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison

GTSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, less than DMCRX's 10.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DMCRX
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
10.81%13.72%3.86%0.87%8.20%48.23%19.79%14.70%33.22%8.91%0.00%4.20%
GTSAX
Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund
8.34%10.45%0.00%0.00%3.60%38.91%13.85%8.96%9.76%9.23%9.35%10.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTSAX and DMCRX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMCRX has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to GTSAX (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSAX dropped -63.62% vs DMCRX's -46.68%.

DMCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTSAX and DMCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer