GTR vs. PHEQ
GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and PHEQ (Parametric Hedged Equity ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GTR returned 19.56% vs 16.41% for PHEQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PHEQ.
Performance
GTR vs. PHEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than PHEQ's 5.93% return.
GTR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHEQ
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTR vs. PHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund | 8.44% | 12.90% | 8.41% | 10.33% |
PHEQ Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | 5.93% | 11.76% | 14.94% | 7.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTR and PHEQ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between GTR and PHEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
GTR vs. PHEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GTR
PHEQ
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
GTR
PHEQ
Financial Services
GTR
PHEQ
Industrials
GTR
PHEQ
Healthcare
GTR
PHEQ
Consumer Cyclical
GTR
PHEQ
Communication Services
GTR
PHEQ
Consumer Defensive
GTR
PHEQ
Energy
GTR
PHEQ
Basic Materials
GTR
PHEQ
Utilities
GTR
PHEQ
Real Estate
GTR
PHEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTR vs. PHEQ — Risk / Return Rank
GTR
PHEQ
GTR vs. PHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTR | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.87 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.06 | 17.69 | -4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTR | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.69 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.81 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
GTR vs. PHEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than PHEQ's maximum drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and PHEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTR | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -12.55% | -8.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -4.26% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -0.97% | -7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 0.93% | +0.57% |
Volatility
GTR vs. PHEQ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Parametric Hedged Equity ETF (PHEQ) at 1.06%. This indicates that GTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTR | PHEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 1.06% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.88% | 4.57% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.45% | 6.13% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 8.61% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 8.61% | +2.25% |
GTR vs. PHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PHEQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTR vs. PHEQ - Dividend Comparison
GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than PHEQ's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund | 5.30% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 2.85% | 0.46% |
PHEQ Parametric Hedged Equity ETF | 1.02% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTR and PHEQ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTR has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to PHEQ (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs PHEQ's -12.55%.
On 1-year performance, GTR leads with 19.56% vs 16.41% for PHEQ. On fees, PHEQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GTR has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 16.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHEQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GTR.
GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 1.02% for PHEQ.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.29% for PHEQ.
PHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTR and PHEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer