GTR vs. GDE
GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GTR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTR returned 12.84%/yr vs 47.08%/yr for GDE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GDE.
Performance
GTR vs. GDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than GDE's 11.25% return.
GTR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- 19.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDE
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 54.50%
- 3Y*
- 47.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTR vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund | 8.44% | 12.90% | 8.41% | 12.45% | -12.90% |
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 11.25% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -18.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTR and GDE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GTR and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTR vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank
GTR
GDE
GTR vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTR | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.42 | +0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.06 | 7.50 | +5.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTR | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.93 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.17 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
GTR vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum GDE drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and GDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTR | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -32.01% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -22.66% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -22.66% | +9.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -9.99% | +9.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -7.89% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 7.29% | -5.79% |
Volatility
GTR vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is 2.36%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that GTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTR | GDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 6.68% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.88% | 24.27% | -17.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.45% | 28.41% | -18.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 26.12% | -15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.86% | 26.12% | -15.26% |
GTR vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTR vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison
GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than GDE's 3.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 3.88% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% |
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund | 5.30% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 2.85% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTR and GDE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDE has higher volatility (6.68%) compared to GTR (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs GDE's -32.01%.
On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 47.08% vs 12.84% for GTR. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 47.08% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GTR.
GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 3.88% for GDE.
GTR is categorized as Options Trading, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.20% for GDE.
GTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTR and GDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer